Vicious Cycling

v5n12_COVER.jpg

Struggling to ride on two wheels in a four-wheel city.
by Laura Hauther
photos by Meagan Yellott

Every second Friday night of the month, a kinetic storm gathers at the corner of Echo Park St. and Sunset Blvd. Street lights bounce off bike spokes like lightning bolts. A motley crew of bicyclists jam into the parking lot of Pioneer Chicken, sprint down the aisles of the House of Spirits liquor store, and spill recklessly into the busy street. Some just sit atop their bikes-shiny, expensive bikes, thrift store bikes, racing bikes, street bikes, mountain bikes, chopper bikes and bikes tricked-out in unimaginable ways. Their riders are activists, athletes, weekend warriors, hipsters and partiers, first-timers and devoted returnees. They are Midnight Ridazz.

The night rides are often themed-plush dresses and pressed tuxes for Prom night, all white for cult night, Jason masks and make-up gore for Friday the 13th-but tonight the ride is celebratory without getups. 600 bikers converge in high spirits for a ride through the L.A. streets that marks the second anniversary of Midnight Ridazz.

In the early days of the event, 20 or 30 cyclists was considered a good turnout, but as Angelenos discover urban biking the numbers are snowballing, fast. Last June, Los Angeles hosted the annual Bike Summer-a month long celebration of two-wheeled transportation that tours the world-swinging a spotlight on the undeniable, burgeoning bicycle culture here in L.A., the city that loves to drive.

Ride It Like You Stole It

Nationally, the downgrade of many commuters from four to two wheels is impressive. According to the US Chamber of Commerce, bikes out-sold cars in 2005, the first time since the 1970s. Nearly 87 million Americans reported using a bicycle for their commute to work. L.A., for once, is not behind the trend. “More people are showing up at Midnight Ridazz or any other bike event,” says Kastle Lund, president of the L.A. Bike Coalition. “I think that in Central L.A. we saw a huge increase this year in cycling because of Bike Summer. What it was all about is explaining to people that biking is fun, biking is safe. You can do this.”

Tonight’s victory lap-the anniversary ride-kicks off as organizers pass out souvenir spoke cards and directions (no one but the “curators” know the route until darkness strikes). As more riders pull up from every direction, the energy rises. Boomboxes blast from handlebar baskets, flasks come out, as do hand-pumps and wrenches of all sizes. It’s a house party on wheels, but beyond the blabber there is a serious message inherent in the ride: bikes don’t block traffic, they are traffic.

A serious road bike warrior lets out a whoop and a holler, makes a U-turn through the crowd and says, “Let’s go, follow me!” Like that, they’re off and Sunset Blvd. morphs into a giant bike lane.

Midnight Ridazz traverses every corner of L.A. Some rides are Hollywood-heavy; others tour Downtown. The anniversary ride shot through Silver Lake with its headlamp set on the Glendale Galleria parking structure. Reactions from drivers and pedestrians vary every month, but are usually either open mouth amazement or raised fist support. At traffic lights, organizers stop in front of cars so the entire group can get through an intersection if necessary, pissing off some drivers while others just stare in shock at the sea of red blinking safety lights flowing by.

For Somerset Waters, a Midnite Ridazz organizer, fun is a major selling point, “In the political scene, it’s easy to take ourselves too seriously and that’s not going to change any minds. Seeing people riding with smiles, having fun…that’s the kind of diplomacy we’re going for.”

San Francisco’s Critical Mass is the granddaddy of all the mass bike rides. It all started over 10 years ago when bikers, tired of being treated like a nuisance, decided to gather in the hundreds to take over the streets once a month to get drivers’ attentions and deliver the message: Bikes are vehicles and they should be treated as vehicles. More militant in attitude than the Ridazz, their style has, at times, been rather aggressive toward drivers. L.A.’s Ridazz, however, believe you can make the point while having fun and riding with a smile.

Iron Chefs

Like any machine, bikes break down, but compared to a car they’re easy and cheap to fix. Bikers in the East Hollywood area are lucky to have the Bike Kitchen right around the corner-a non-profit bike advocacy center, repair shop and social club.

Here’s how it works: For $7 an hour you get your own personal “cook” who will take you step by step through changing a tire, replacing a chain, fixing the brakes or even building an entire bike from used parts. The place is stuffed with bike guts. There are whole filing cabinets full of recycled bike chains, trash cans full of tires and tubes, bike carcasses hanging from the ceiling and used bikes of every shape, size and condition lined up on the sidewalk out front. If something needs replacing, recycled parts are free, and if the right parts aren’t at hand, improvising is encouraged.

Bike stands (the bike version of a car lift) also go for $7 an hour if you have the skills to go it alone, but no one is turned away for lack of funds. And for those people for whom bikes are a way of life, annual memberships are offered as well, where $70 gets you unlimited stand time and the $100 deluxe membership includes discounts on gear. It’s a bargain either way and every penny goes toward the Kitchen’s bare necessities: rent, utilities, tools. (The Kitchen is run entirely by volunteers.)

The Bicycle Kitchen started about four years ago in (what else?) a kitchen. Almost two years ago they moved into their own shop on Heliotrope near LACC. It’s a perfect spot for the Kitchen-a quiet street off of Melrose next to a little café, FAKE art gallery is right around the corner, as is noise den Il Corral, a couple of interesting ethnic restaurants, a headshop across the street, and other storefronts that haven’t yet acquired the slick varnish of gentrification. Since the move to the new space, things have gotten a bit more organized and structured from the days of hanging out and fixing bikes while downing pizza and beer. There are regular hours. Just recently they started offering classes in “Wheel Building” and “Basic and Advanced Wrenching” (otherwise known as bike repair). The organization has become so legit that the Durfee Foundation recently offered them a $10,000 grant to keep the Kitchen (ahem) rolling.

The grant was also well-deserved recognition of the important work the Kitchen does over and above mechanics. Jimmy Lizama-one of the Kitchen’s founders-gets frustrated when people think of the Kitchen’s work only in terms of helping the environment. “We’re using bikes as a way to solve social problems. We’re also creating a community here.”

Frederico Tobon-a 27 year old Bicycle Kitchen cook-thinks of the bike culture as a network as well. “The Kitchen functions as a node in the network, a place where informational lines intersect. So even though we mostly specialize in mechanical stuff, we share all kinds of information here.”

Tobon’s conversion to the bike-only lifestyle happened when he moved here from Colombia and couldn’t afford a car. By the time he could, he didn’t want one. Instead, he became a devotee of the fixed gear bike. Fixed gears are stripped-down bikes with no cables or controls of any kind, including brakes. The rider decides which gear is right-loose enough to get up hills and tight enough to allow enough control to stop easily. The speed is set entirely by the rider through the pedals, there’s no coasting on a fixed gear.

“I feel more connected to the bike, I’m forced to be very aware of everything going on around me so I can easily flow with the traffic,” Tobon says. Even after talking about how fixed gears were declared illegal in Holland after a safety study found their braking ability inadequate, he insists he feels safer on his fixed gear.

There’s actually a bit of (not-so-serious) controversy around the subject. Some bikers think riding fixed gears is just a trend started by people trying to emulate bike messengers-considered the toughest of the hardcore bikers. Definitely only for the experienced rider, fixed gear bikes have found a following among avid cyclists.

In Tobon’s work as an electrician, he and his boss haul all their gear by bike. Ladders, tools, everything goes on the back of the bike or a specially designed bike trailer. In the back of the Kitchen, Tobon points out an unusual bike designed to carry heavy or bulky loads called an SUB-or Sport Utility Bicycle. A company called Xtracycle builds them, promising they’ll haul “any combination of surfboards, chainsaws and jell-o cakes” you might need to get from point A to point B. Designed by bike lovers to make life easier for the car-less, it has two big saddlebags around the back tire and a platform on top of it. It can even accommodate a passenger comfortably. Not surprisingly, the bike also carries a pretty heavy price tag of $700 to $1,000. But the mechanically inclined can purchase DIY conversion kits for $224 to $400.

The Bicycle Kitchen is an example of-much like the bikes they help make-a whole that’s greater than the sum of its parts. The more established they become, the goal turns to establishing things like the Earn-A-Bike program that offers neighborhood children a chance to build a bike of their own. The kids are required to put in a number of hours learning bicycle maintenance and working on donated bikes until they learn enough to care for and repair bikes themselves. And for the ladies, there’s Bicycle Bitchen every Monday night-a time for the female cooks to work with women, teaching them how to fix-up and trick-out the bike of their dreams. About a third of the cooks and a quarter of the patrons are women, but Emily Ramsey-one of the Bitchen night hosts-believes women-only workshop times are more welcoming for newbies.

“The idea is to create a space for women coming down for the first time to feel comfortable getting down and dirty… in an atmosphere that’s not intimidating,” says Ramsey. “It’s not about being exclusionary.”

The Kitchen’s such a hit it has inspired a spin-off: Nestled in the heart of Highland Park, not far from Mr. T’s Bowl, the East L.A. Bike Oven opens its doors every Wednesday night, offering free boxed wine, pan dulce and DIY bike repair.

The Hackers

Every scene has its hackers, and the L.A. bike scene is no different. There’s no end to what some people will do to a bike when they get their hands on a welder. Like the aptly named “tall bike,” created by sticking two frames together, one on top of the other so the rider is about 7 feet off the ground. To quote Paul de Verla, an experienced tall bike rider: “These bikes are very fun and draw a lot of attention to the rider; they also hurt a lot when you fall off them.” Hard to argue with that.

De Verla founded the Choppercabras Horrorcycle Club, a chopper bike club that’s spawned chapters all over the country. A visit to the Choppercabras website yields a pretty thorough introduction to the weird and wonderful world of the hacked bike, with plenty of links to Frankenbike-style clubs from New York to Portland. They stretch the limits of the term “bicycle” by building pedal-powered machines ranging from the stylish to the strange.

Among the Choppercabra’s creations is the “chopper” bike, which is just what it sounds like: the handlebars and front forks are extended to Easy Rider length (though its hard to picture Peter Fonda pedaling one). These tricked-out bikes are notoriously difficult to ride, but aficionados are as passionate about them as their low-riding automotive counterparts.

For the less adventurous, there’s the cruiser-a mellow variant of the chopper with a frame that’s been stretched out and lowered, perfect for when you’re in the mood for taking it easy.

Then there’s a unique creation called the Squirrel-a bike with a back wheel that can swivel like a front wheel, making it capable of almost right-angle turns. Living up to its name, a bike like this has a very steep learning curve.

Possessed of seemingly boundless energy and a really bad attitude (just pick up a copy of his Chicken-Head Records Zine) Choppercabras’ de Verla is such a devotee of the bicycle that he quit his day job to open his own shop, Atomic Cycles. Because his mission in life is to get your ass on a bicycle seat and riding, he takes mostly used bikes, fixes them up himself and sells them for as little as $45.

But you’ll find no preaching about the purity of the biker lifestyle from de Verla. “Bikes are my passion, that’s why I ride. For me it’s not political, it’s not about the environment-I own four cars-I just love to ride.”

But what good’s a hacked bike if you can’t show it off? The Choppercabras put on annual events where all comers are welcome to participate in either the Battle Royale (tall bike jousting fights) or the demolition derby (using bikes with cowcatchers welded on to the front fenders). Some things to remember if you’re thinking of joining in: There are no rules. Blood is drawn. Play at your own risk.

“Fuck your Schwinn, Copper!”

Even outside of official competition, there’s some serious risk involved in urban cycling-a fact which the authorities are well aware of. When cops see 600 very loud and rowdy Midnight Ridazz rolling down the road at 11:30 on a Friday night, they get nervous. So nervous, in fact, that the anniversary event warranted a fly-over by a police helicopter and an escort out of Glendale. But the reaction could’ve been much worse; in other cities group bike rides have ended in mass arrests and ongoing animosity with law enforcement.

In August 2004, a Critical Mass in New York City ended in hundreds of arrests, as the NYPD scooped up participants. But last month, a New York City Criminal Court found the permit law and the subsequent arrests of Critical Mass riders unconstitutional. The battle plays out differently in every city that hosts a Critical Mass event.

Lund of the L.A. Bike Coalition confirms that police don’t look too kindly on bikers in general. “If there’s an accident, the police will almost always write up a car-bicycle accident as ‘NO fault,’ even if the car was clearly at fault. Their attitude is, ‘You’re crazy for being on the road with a bike to begin with.’” And that’s not the worst part; the proposed fine for killing a cyclist with a car is a paltry $250. The police/biker dynamic has become a big enough problem that the coalition is proposing a study to survey accident reports and police attitudes toward bikers with the ultimate goal of educating police about street bikers.

The coalition is also working with city governments in and around Los Angeles developing Bicycle Master Plans that will ensure all transportation projects include accommodations for the growing number of bikers. So far, 10 cities have adopted the plans, hoping to make bicycling an everyday part of getting around L.A.

Musician and activist Aurisha Smolarski is garnering support for a simpler, more immediate improvement: bike-friendly street signs called “sharrows” designed to remind drivers of their obligation to share the road and to help bikers avoid getting “doored” by riding too close to parked cars (one of the most common bike accidents). “We’re at the very beginning stages; we’re going to different communities for input to figure out the best place to start a pilot program,” says Smolarski. “We want to start with five routes and then, hopefully, get them set up all over Los Angeles.”

Not all bikers like the idea of sharrows. Detractors fear it could be a step toward segregating and restricting bikers, and since bikes are already allowed full use of the lane, certain cyclists feel it’s unnecessary. Advocates believe they are an inexpensive and easy way to increase safety and reduce road rage incidents without swimming through the sea of red tape necessary for implementing bike lanes.

The other option is the method of Vehicular Cycling-treating a bicycle as a form of transportation equal to motorized vehicles, with the same rights and responsibilities. These bikers follow the same rules as drivers: fully stopping at all stop signs and traffic signals, using the full lane of the road instead of bike lanes. Vehicular Cyclists believe this gives them greater visibility, making it more likely drivers will treat them with consideration and respect on the road. Using side streets is one of the best ways to avoid traffic, stay safe and have a less stressful ride. Bikers often share info on the best scenic back routes or alternatives to the more congested city streets, routes that drivers would eschew because of slow speed limits and numerous stop signs .

Once familiar with these back routes, getting through town can be surprisingly quick and easy, says Adam Brisben, a musician living in Silver Lake. His co-workers thought he was crazy for biking the 14 miles to his job in Santa Monica until the day his co-worker left the parking lot the same times he did. “We arrived at the same time at the off-ramp on Silverlake Blvd.,” says Brisben. “When he spotted me riding by, his mouth just hung open, he couldn’t believe we made it at the same time.”

But the bike does not always win.

That Friday, as the Ridazz coasted down Sunset, past the starting point and on toward Elysian Park, a wail of sirens sprung from the back of the parade. An ambulance and a fire truck sped along the wrong side of the street, lights ablaze. Cries of “Sidewalk!” bounced up the line. Some cyclists braked to a halt, and more than a couple took rear-ended hits from bikers behind them.

The corner of Echo Park and Sunset, already glowing from its large orange mural, became a snarled intersection of danger disco lights. A car sat in the crosswalk, unmanned, doors open, directly in front of an upturned bicycle. Ridazz piled around to watch a fellow biker be dressed in a body splint and rolled on a stretcher into the ambulance. EMTs on the scene said the biker was alive, conscious and talking. No serious injuries were sustained.

The bike crowd dispersed as they came, pedaling in different directions toward home, along the smooth, well-lit bike trails and empty streets of L.A. LAA

Oisin Feeley said,

February 18, 2006 @ 12:51 am

Good article. I especially like the fact that you took the time to mention that Vehicular Cycling is considered by many to be the least stressful, most enjoyable and safest way to cycle. It’s also worth pointing out that “sharrows” are a completely unproven technology. The data from their limited implementation in other cities is non-conclusive and their proposed adoption in L.A. is as a pilot program to gather data. Let’s hope that the people advocating them now don’t find themselves in the same position as those that lobbied hard for bike lanes 8 years ago — very embarrassed and wishing that dangerous bike lanes could be removed.

Leandro said,

February 18, 2006 @ 6:00 am

I appreciate any pro biking articles that come out in Los Angeles because it’s so hard to bike in this city. People in Cars do think that they have the right of way just because they’re in cars and will NOT hesitate to hit you and let their publicist of lawyer take care of it later. This miht sound a bit negative but I bike for a living, I’ve been a bike messenger at one of the busiest companies in downtown for over three years. I have to admit, I didn’t read your whole article. I had to stop when the article started to glorify Midnight Ridazz. I did the anniversary ride (my first actually. I tend to stay away from bullshit bicycle political movements..my idealism having been squeezed out of me by experience). This is what I saw. A WHOLE BUNCH of little ds who had no idea how to ride their Track and Fixed gear bikes, getting caught up in a PACK mentality and LITERALLY hurting other bikers. A friend of mine was cut off by a BMX’er chanting a political slogan and forced face first into the concrete (this is a seasoned messenger too) did the guy stop to help him? NO! also another biker ran into some poor girl, destroying her bike then riding off into the crowd whooping and hollaring. Then there was the guy who got hit by a car. Seems to me that Midnight Ridazz was better when it was 30 people that knew eachother and just wanted to have fun and ride together. Now its a bunch of pretenders who discovered a bike yesterday and run the streets with their big mouths ruining the experience for everyone else…..NO THANKS!

federico said,

February 18, 2006 @ 7:36 pm

my extended comments here:
http://bicyclekitchen.blogspot.com/2006/02/vicious-writing.html

Will Campbell said,

February 19, 2006 @ 4:27 pm

I greatly enjoyed this article, but if I may pick at a nit… I believe refering to the February Midnight Ridazz event as the two-year anniversary ride is incorrect. I’ve heard that next month’s ride will be the one that marks the event’s 2004 birth.

And as to Leandro’s complaints and generalizations in the comment above, yikes! He blows credibility with broad strokes like drivers “will not hesitate to hit you.” Anyone who bikes in L.A. with any regularity (be it for work or play) no doubt has their share of stories to tell about irresponsible or negligent people in cars. But I’ve probably been riding these streets for longer than Leandro’s been alive and while there will always be close calls when sharing the road with automobiles, my perception is that the vast majority of drivers out there are aware and respectful of cyclists. It may be a begrudging respect, but they’re certainly not out there to run me over and leave the mess for their lawyers to clean up as Leandro would insist we believe.

I also take issue with his characterization of Midnight Ridazz as being populated by predominately reckless cyclists. Again, there’s certainly a percentage of careless and inexperienced riders and sadly, they cause problems — and I’m sorry he experienced so many. My opinion differs because over the three Midnight Ridazz I’ve participated in the results have been positive and I look forward to supporting and riding in many more of these unique events.

Eddy said,

February 20, 2006 @ 1:06 pm

For those of you who are looking to either get involved or stay connected with the local bike scene check out www.cicle.org and www.bikeboom.com.

Leandro said,

February 21, 2006 @ 6:26 am

Will may be right. I may have generalized a little bit. But I gotta say that “The Vast Majority of Drivers out there are aware and respectful of cyclists” may be a little naive. As for having been biking in Los Angeles for longer than Ive been alive, maybe so, I have no idea how old you are, but I have been biking in the city for a very long time and I have worked as a messenger in more cities than just LA so I have a little experience to compair and contrast what its like in LA and other places. People may be tolerant of cyclists if youre using the bike lane on Sunset Blvd. on a Sunday morning, but I think those same respectful people change their attitudes on a weekday at 8:00 in the morning. I experience it everyday, as do you Will, and I bike a 8 mile line into work that has everybody from West Hollywood rushing into work and out of work in the evening. Thats wat I base my “Generalizations” on. Isn’t the whole point of something like Midnight Ridazz or Critical Mass because “the vast majority of drivers” are NOT respectful?

Markd said,

February 21, 2006 @ 10:12 am

Its dangerous out there, period…

A car vs. bike scenerio, no matter how you arrange the lanes or laws, is a risky situation. However, that doesnt mean bikes lose. Im sure the underlying idea, which I think undermines Leandro’s criticism of Midnight Ridazz (or Ten O’Clock Ridazz), is that people dont realize how beneficial a bike can be and the only way to find out is to start pedaling.

What shoud result from this, if people dont get discouraged from a sore set of legs or ass, is that they might want to use the bike more often. So Ridazz may welcome the inexperienced to the pro, but we all started pedaling as newbies, fixed or not. What I love about riding with my friends is that there isnt any sense of unwarranted pride or scencester mentality. We embrace anyone because we love the experience and want people to start thinking differently about bikes. Why? Nothing too philosophical, its just that bikes are fun and a smart way to commute.

Reckless bikers during Ridazz is a minority and its not even much of an issue. Ive crashed on the last two rides, one being my fault. But this is a critical mass…if I were crashing when commuting to school or shopping, etc…than I might be more concerned about the nature of my attitude. (How trained are cyclist on the Tour de France? How many persons fell from competing sue to accidents?) I think there needs to be a default understanding of the ride…people are not showing up thinking that I need to watch for this or that, as when they ride solo, (though they should) they’re out to have fun, shout, scream, drink, and socialize. If you’re afraid of crashing than you shouldnt be on a bike, let alone a bike going 5mph. I think any teenager learning tricks on his BMX will tell you the same. Riding a bike and crashing on a ride is something to expect. Plus I see more “accidents” than careless riders causing problems. How many fights have we seen between riders?

Basicly, why are the on-lookers complaining? I know people who crashed and they’re anticipating the next ride. People riding foolishly are generally cool, if you’re cool and just say, “hey, you almost hit a guy, have fun, but be a little careful.” Whos the bigger ass, the person who rides stupid or the stupid person who trys to embarass him or her by shouting in front of a bunch of people. I swear it feels like the LAPD is riding with us sometimes. Just ride up nicely and make a clear and infromative comment. Remember everyone is trying to have a good time.

Let me get back the bike vs car issue. So the fact that their are inexperienced bicyclist, does not justify the reckless behavior of motorist. Riding in L.A., Ive honestly encountered more problems with drivers that “looked” like the decent law-abiding citizens. I get more shit from rich F*ckers than any others. Now I may be over-generalizing, but to me, it seems like these folks think they own the road.

Granted you get your tough guys and gals that want to show off their skills by driving as close as they can, but we must remember (as some of us drive as well) that as a driver Im far more worried about hitting a cyclist than a car. So there is an inherent danger in the situation, but we need to press on in numbers and in support of educating safe ways to ride. Leandro would be benefical in this area, since he is so well trained. Why not join Ridazz and hand out safety pamphlets,etc… Now if more people ride safer and more people ride in general, what is a logical outcome for Leandro and his problems in downtown?

And look riding in downtown is different than other areas…People are busy and in a rush. Again, this doesnt mean they are right…they control a vehicle that is more powerful than they understand…I may be biased, but that means they have a greater responsiblity to pay attention.

I may be jumping to conclusions, but I think drivers get most annoyed when they see us pedaling away and reaching every light just a quickly and if not we pass by them and five other cars. Jealousy? I think so, but hey, and this is my overall point:

Lets get them on a bike and show them what its about.

Lets get rid of this Ive biked since I was in diapers roadblock and start thinking about what all this experience can do for the future of cycling. We need more riders and we need more leaders.

Markd

Shay said,

February 21, 2006 @ 10:54 am

Read someone’s very thoughful and well written response to this article at: http://www.cicle.org/cicle_content/pivot/entry.php?id=418#comm

Leandro said,

February 21, 2006 @ 6:11 pm

Its not about people crashing. Its about reckless people causing accidents and not even stopping to apologize or help out. And I witnessed 3 seperate incidents of this. Why does there have to be some political underlyiung theme? why cant people admit that theyre just riding around and getting drunk with their friends?

Markd said,

February 21, 2006 @ 11:53 pm

I dont remember anyone denying that they’re riding around getting drunk with their friends. According to your approach, I could reduce it even further and say, “why cant people admit that they’re just riding around?” Well, they do admit this and more. My friends and I drink and ride, but do you think thats all it means to us?

Could I honestly say, “why cant bike messengers just admit that they’re just making money?” Would it be fair? Dont many bike messengers love their job?

Theres more to riding together, though for some it invovles alcohol, it does not mean it ends there. Try another ride and just try to enjoy it.

Leandro said,

February 22, 2006 @ 6:12 am

I’d like to say that I went to Midnight Ridazz with a completely open mind to just experience something that I had not done before and was getting a lot of attention in the downtown messenger scene. So I went. For the most part I had fun. But then again I witnessed some things that made me pissed off. If someone goes on a ride like Midnight Ridazz they have a respansability to themselves, the people they ride with and the community at large. Seriously, wouldnt you be pissed off if strange people were pissing in your yard? or what if you were dring your car and some kid, hopped up on the experience from the ride u-locked the hood of your car for no reason? I really disagree with the idea that if you’re worried about crashing then you shouldn’t be on a bike, you say that on the one hand and then on the other you say “lets get more people on bikes.” Well, that idea doesn’t allow for any of the instances where someone crashes into you and destroys something of yours that wouldnt be destroyed if it were not for them. Im not afraid of crashing, but if someone crashes into me and wrecks my bike then I HAVE to spend a bunch of money and TIME to fix it. Heres how it breaks down for me and anyone else who makes a living with their bike regardless of wether theyre a messenger or not:

My bike gets wrecked and I have no cash to fix it I dont work.
I dont work then I cant pay my bills, rent or food because my bike is my job.

I have an interest in keeping my bike tip top. If anyone goes to Ridazz they have the right to have a fun time and if someone crashes into them then they have the respansability to help that person out. From what I understand that was the RULE when Ridazz first started.

Im by no means saying that I hate ridazz or its a bad thing, but it’s in my nature to question things that I find questionable when I am given the oportunity. I also dont feel that any of my posts have been Antagonistic in any way and I dont feel that I have been jumping to conclusions or trying to play the I know best ’cause Im a messenger card either. I am just callin it like I see it and sharing MY experiences.

Id like to invite anyone to come downtown and follow me on a day of work. If you want to comment on what I’ve got to say walk a mile in my shoes so at least you can debate me in an informed way. Then you can see what I deal with on a daily basis.

Markd said,

February 22, 2006 @ 10:11 am

I hear you…I wasnt disagreeing with you about people not taking responsibilty when crahing into another rider. Im just saying that the ride itself furnishes the opportunity for people who dont ride, to start. I agree with you that if someone just rides off after hiting someone, that they are very wrong. For one the person could be hurt and like you said, their bike might be trashed.

I just think theres this tension in your comments that stems from wanting this cycling thing to be pure, but as we know, theres both. Many of us started on BMX as kids, raising havoc on the streets. Some are safety freaks (if thats possible–I have no qualms), some just want to get out and ride w/ everyone, some have political motives, etc…

what we need to agree on is that everyone is converging…this means that you get the irresponsible to the responisble. This doesnt negate the ride as a whole. If the ride stopped forever and the 30 or so riders you appreciate went their way, who cares? If all the “pretenders” (whatever that means) go their way, then Im not even sure what this discussion is getting at.

This is a bicycle ride. Thats it. People driving cars, pull over and piss in yards. Think of car clubs, etc… Why is their such a negative outlook on something that is largely a success? How many events can brag about 600 people attending, without any fights or hostility amongst each other? And this happens once a month FOR FREE.

I guess I can come off as trying to justify to much, but thats not my aim. I just dont think its fair to judge the ride by a portion of its riders. I mean you work in downtown…let along Los Angeles, which is one of the most diverse areas of the world. We live, work and educate ourselves amongst this diversity of attitudes and personalities…so why would Ridazz be any different?

People may make it political because it can be…but it embraces everyone…

i respect the ride because it helped get me back on a bike, but more so because theres a feeling that is missing in the city. A feeling of ownership. The people who live in the city, feel so much tension that home is not really home. Rent is crazy, jobs dont pay shit, evrywhere you go its expensive or designed for tourist. So one night, we go out and just feel like the streets are actually “for us”…the land is for its inhabitants.

In this sense, I make the ride a philosophical or political entity. I think it represents some of the same feelings that Reclaim the Streets had, just far less political. There is this tension though that people want to enjoy where they live. Where can people go to just hang out? Where can you go without paying alot of money? Its shops, shops, shops…

If this is political then this is why I enjoy the ride. Im not rich and I dont like spending a grip of cash to have fun with my friends and sometimes we want to leave the house. Thats my feeling entering the ride…but thats just one bicycle rider. It just entertains these ideas for me. I think you can find your part or not…Im sure its not for everyone, but one thing it cant be, is judge based handful of people. Its many things, but first a bicycle ride.

But again I agree with you…we need take responsiblity for injuring a person or another riders bike. Remember, no one advocates hurting each other, so the idea that you can ride off is a mistake coming into the ride and moreover not everyone will do it.

Thanks for chopping it up.

Leandro said,

February 23, 2006 @ 7:07 pm

What I meant by “Pretenders” are those that try and look to be something they’re not. Let’s be real here. Track bikes and fixed gear bikes are getting popular because the messenger culture made it popular. Not just here in LA but also Team PUMA in NYC and SF. When I first came downtown there were two people on track bikes (you know who you are). I’m not even going to get on this tip though because it’s a neverending argument, and also I do enjoy seeing new riders out there, I just like to see people coming to this thing as WHO THEY ARE and not HOW THEY WANT TO BE PERCIEVED. Thats what I meant by using the word pretenders. Also, I Know that there would have been a fight at the last midnight riders if my friend had had the luxury of actually seeing who hit him. And you know what? I would have stood by him because that person was waaayyy out of line. Not to mention at the end of the ride I almost came to blows with some guy who started pushing me out of the blue over something he thought I said to some girl over after she tried to remove a bicycle from under a car at the scene of an accident. Not to mention the time a couple months ago when another person I know had a gun pulled on him for needlessly missing with a drivers car. Seems that in the last few monthys a lot of could-be or near tragadies were NARROWLY avoided. I think that now is the time for those who organize midnight ridazz to start regulating and maybe thinking about how this thing can be better organized or there will be fights and accidents. For the most part i enjoyed the ride, that doesn’t mean it couldnt stand improvement.

Colin Bogart said,

March 6, 2006 @ 10:34 pm

I’m happy to see articles such as this one printed in non-cycling publications. Whether the participants in Ridazz intend it or not, just doing the ride is helping to promote a greater awareness of cyclists in this city. Thanks to Laura for her work and LA Alternative for printing this piece.

In response to Oisin’s comments about Sharrows - it’s true, they are a pilot program and their implementation up to this point has been limited. That’s part of the problem. The agencies that should implement these kinds of pilot projects don’t want to try anything new. Well, someone has to give it a go. Why not in Los Angeles where we should try whatever we can to improve the cyclist’s lot? I also think it’s a little unfair to imply the project may ultimately be an embarrassment. Let’s not jump to conclusions so quickly. Why not see the project through and review the results? So far the response to the Sharrow campaign has been very impressive.

With regards to people causing accidents at Ridazz, I’d like to add this. There are rude and inconsiderate people in every scene. Don’t let that ruin Ridazz for you. Tell people they’re being reckless when they are riding in a way that puts you and your friends at risk. Communicate with the riders around you. No one I’ve met at Ridazz (or any other ride) is a mindreader, so we have to tell each other if we’re slowing down, stopping, etc. Encourage novice or inexperienced riders to participate and politely correct mistakes that come from inexperience (stopping in the middle of the street with hundreds of riders behind you is not wise - pull to the side of the road please). If we want cycling to grow in L.A., we have to accept newcomers. When you think about it, how cool is it that we’re starting to debate if Ridazz might be too big!? (It’s not).

I think I understand Leandro’s concerns, and possibly those of other messengers. If I were a messenger I’d be concerned about getting hurt and/or damaging my bike at Ridazz or any other large group ride. On group rides, the question is not if people will get hurt but how many and how badly. This is the reality of all group rides and we all need to be aware of it. This is not to say we shouldn’t all be careful and considerate of those around us. More importantly, we should all remind our friends and fellow riders to ride safely and look out for each other. We should do this every time we ride together. We all own a little bit of Ridazz and we can all make it better. As for the messenger dilemma, I’m not sure I have a solution. Messengers also run the risk of getting hurt every time they ride to and from work or anywhere else they go on their bikes. It seems to me that being a messenger is a tough job in more ways than one. I respect their committment. One small suggestion that pops into my head is this. Perhaps Leandro or any other messenger concerned about his/her “good” bike should borrow (or buy?) a cheap used bike for Ridazz. Leave the good bike safely at home. I know it’s not the greatest suggestion, but I’m trying…

Finally, and this is the shameless plug at the end, if you want to see change in Los Angeles for cyclists, support the L.A. County Bicycle Coalition as well as Cicle.org, the Bicycle Kitchen, the Bike Oven, etc. Don’t wait for someone else to do something. Get involved. It’s your city too. See you all at the next Ridazz!

psychylist said,

March 31, 2006 @ 6:06 pm

Excellent article!

As far as the Midnite Ridazz debate goes, there are going to be jerks in every crowd. We are in California, aren’t we? Everyone has their reason(s) for participating in an event like this and going in with that mindset is what people like Leandro need to acquire before participating. Also, someone with as much professed cycling expenience as Leandro claims should know that a mixed bag event like that will have the full range of skill andexperience on a bicycle.

I have participated in one Midnite Ridazz and went in with the right attitude, going to just have fun. Nobody was going to ruin it for me, except me and I didn’t even get close to letting the small things get me down. I stayed aware of everyone around me and gave anyone even a little sketchy a wide berth, as any experienced cyclist should do as a basic cycling instinct.

There is one anecdote that was somewhat negative that was made more amusing by a simple comment. One particular rider was yelling at every vehicle with an open window, making somewhat of a spectacle of himself. That was his bag and I found it more amusing than irritating. At the bar stop, some traffic was being blocked and a couple of 30ish women in a car asked me what was going on. I sidled over to their vehicle and explained what was going on. They appeared more interested in participating than the fact that they were being blocked by a few less than responsible riders. I gave them the web address to Bicycle Kitchen and moseyed back to the curb, when out of the night comes Old Yeller. He proceeds to yell at these nice women about killing dead dinosaurs of some goofy and tired diatribe, obviously turning them off the whole thing in an instant. My response was plain and simple. I asked him what was in the hubs of his bicycle, knowing there had to be a petrochemical present in them. Old Yeller paused as a few chuckles were emitted from others who had witnessed this and finally answered with a weakly defiant, “air”. I said, “Yeah, right.” as he turned and melted back into tte crowd.

Yeah, I’ll go back and will be amused by it all again. It was the most fun I ever had on a Friday night in LA. This is coming from a native Anglelno who has been around since the 60’s.

jdb said,

May 17, 2006 @ 2:59 pm

Nice article. Two very important facts about Vehicular Cycling [or at least my interpretation] were omitted though. The California Driver’s Handbook (yes, the one you get at the DMV) clearly states that cyclists “are part of the normal traffic flow and share the road with other drivers”.

The handbook also notes that cyclists can legally “move left” (occupy more of a lane) for a variety of reasons including to “avoid hazards”. In other words, if a cyclist has to ride near the center of a narrow lane in order to avoid parked car doors, then that is permitted.

What I’m getting at here is that riding in this manner is not just a choice but a mandate from the DMV. If you took a case to court and showed that you followed DMV guidelines, I expect you’d have a high likelyhood of winning a “case”. My handbook lists the rules on pages 48 and 49, although it may have been updated in the last year or two. Check it out for yourself. I’ve found that following these rules, and using clear hand signals whenever practical, minimizes signs of motorist protest.

Be safe out there.

Oisin said,

October 4, 2006 @ 12:02 pm

Colin Bogart wrote:

In response to Oisin’s comments about Sharrows - it’s true, they are a pilot program and their implementation up to this point has been limited. That’s part of the problem. The agencies that should implement these kinds of pilot projects don’t want to try anything new. Well, someone has to give it a go. Why not in Los Angeles where we should try whatever we can to improve the cyclist’s lot? I also think it’s a little unfair to imply the project may ultimately be an embarrassment. Let’s not jump to conclusions so quickly. Why not see the project through and review the results? So far the response to the Sharrow campaign has been very impressive.

I think the main objection that I have to Sharrows is that they say “cyclists are allowed to be positioned here because of this magic marking”. Implicit in this is the idea that cyclists are not supposed to be positioned correctly in the lane without a sharrow marking.

Given the prevalence of pretty awful bikelanes throughout Los Angeles (and I have to confess to 6 years ago having ridden down Sunset Blvd with the then director of LACBC chanting “what do we want? more bikelanes!) and the apparent permanence of these structures and the absolute slowness of the LACBC to admit that there’s anything wrong with them I don’t want to see ANOTHER failure being implemented.

The solution is probably not to spend time seeking out new ways to put paint on asphalt but to train cyclists in Vehicular Cycling, to provide assistance to cyclists taking court-cases that affect all our rights to the road, and to lobby politically against any negative changes to the road layout.

Every lane is a bike lane until you start marking them off.

Bob said,

January 31, 2007 @ 9:13 pm

Thank for making this valuable information available to the public.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI


Leave a Comment