Jesus Camp’s look at Christian boot camp is scary, but surface level.
by Jay Antani
Rating: 2 out of 5

Documentary collaborators Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady’s Jesus Camp opens with, and ultimately returns to, a series of wonderfully evocative images of Middle America—Missouri, to be exact—in lush green swaths of open land, cloud-swept skies, and that most precious of commodities for all of us in the L.A. Basin, clean air. But whatever charm the place might hold is quickly poisoned by the fact that it’s also a hotbed of Christian fundamentalism.
Ahead of mid-term elections, Jesus Camp is a frightening but generally un-illuminating portrait of Christian America—an America that claims a significant part of the nation’s heartland and has our legislature and judiciary by the balls. To impress that latter point, Ewing and Grady make the nomination and confirmation of the conservative Justice Samuel Alito Jr. to the Supreme Court a running theme throughout their film, reminding us of the Religious Right’s effective commandeering of power.
Jesus Camp gives us a glimpse of evangelist homes and mega-churches where children are indoctrinated into an extremely literalist Christian mindset. It’s a movement whose ideology is as aggressively intolerant as that of any Islamist madrasa, and whose pastors are our homegrown equivalents of the radical mullahs. This is a parallel that Jesus Camp doesn’t have to labor over, because it practically does so on its own in the person of self-styled children’s pastor Becky Fischer. Like her Islamist counterparts, Fischer and others in her trade seek to mould their pre-adolescent congregants into miniature soldiers, armed with a missionary zeal bent on converting America into a coast-to-coast Crystal Cathedral. At one point, the pastor references the indoctrination of Palestinian children into adopting radical Islam as a justification for the evangelical mission in America.
Fischer presides over Kids on Fire, a Christian camp in which children are initiated into the full package of extreme right-wing thought. They pray over a life-sized cutout of George W. Bush, they speak in tongues and go into conniptions. They speak passionately about “finding Christ,†about stamping out abortion, and galvanizing their generation with the Christian spirit. Even ordinarily, I’d find such talk disturbing, but from the mouths of 8, 10, and 12-year-olds, it’s downright scary. The problem with Jesus Camp, though, is that it leaves the matter there, in shock-value, 20/20 territory, without taking a more sophisticated look into this phenomenon.
From liberal Air America radio host Mike Papantonio, an observant Methodist, we get a nominal counterweight: an appeal for religious moderation. But it’s a shout in the wind, because Ewing and Grady focus their attention largely on the Christian fundamentalists—an uninteresting notion, because extremism in any form, apart for its power to incite fear, is intensely boring. By nature, zealotry is monolithic and unmoving, rather than dynamic and evolving; it does not stand up to dramatic treatment per se. Watching these morally co-opted, religiously manic youngsters, I wanted Jesus Camp to provide a voice to answer for their fragile psychologies, or input from non-evangelist parents concerned about the effect people like Fischer are wreaking on their communities. I wondered how an intelligent, incisive documentarian indigenous to this milieu would’ve treated this subject because, to my mind, that would’ve made for a more socially constructive final product. As it is, there is nothing in Jesus Camp we didn’t already know or suspect was happening in America. And for any documentary subject to be worthy of attention, the maker must render it in far more shaded and complex ways that Ewing and Grady manage here. Jesus Camp doesn’t just preach to the converted, it bores and frightens them. LAA
Rated PG-13; opens September 29 in select theaters.
“I wondered how an intelligent, incisive documentarian indigenous to this milieu would’ve treated this subject because, to my mind, that would’ve made for a more socially constructive final product.” – Jay Antani
Yes – that’s good policy… let the wolves report what’s happening in the henhouse.
I apologize for the judgement I make – but it can’t be helped… YOU’RE AN IDIOT, JAY.
If you find the reason for the downfall of this country boring, you are more idiotic than the George Bush cutout. These people are trying to make America of one religion because they “have the answer”. Don’t they realize that most of the aborted humans would be raised by people who do not share their beliefs? Jesus Camp held a mirror up to these freaks and showed them for who they are. I’m suprised they had any reflection at all, given their vampire like ways of controlling the developing minds of innocent children. If only Harry Potter could make these wackos disappear. I find it amazing they preach against one fictional character while putting all of their faith in another.
“because extremism in any form, apart for its power to incite fear, is intensely boring”
Um, ok, Jay Antani. Yes, you are obviously “well-versed”, you are obviously “progressive”.
But don’t assume most of the people in this country ARE!! Many people need to see this! You’re just trying to look cool by snuffing a very important picture. I’m glad this is getting out!
Reviewes like you cannot see the bigger picture, just the extent of your own ego.
Yes, it is always a smart argument to call somebody an “idiot”. Never fails. Keep it up, Jules.
“The problem with Jesus Camp, though, is that it leaves the matter there, in shock-value, 20/20 territory, without taking a more sophisticated look into this phenomenon.â€
I couldn’t agree more!
I’m waiting for the second installment; some kind of exploration into the depths of these beliefs. I wanted, and waited (in vain) for someone to just ask these kids, what it is that’s making them sob. It’s understandable that some feel the footage speaks for itself, and on some level it does…but only ‘in tongues.’ There is a consistent need for some objectivity, explanation and predictions to counter the ‘experience.’ How else is an audience supposed to draw any conclusion?
All I thought about was this was a film about child abuse.
I actually agree with Jay. I just saw this film, and although it certainly reveals troubling and scary issues, it doesn’t dig beneath the surface to answer the question “why”. I don’t doubt the facts they bring to the table with this film, but it’s kind of executed like a propoganda film, or at least an opinion article.
I was really saddened though, and shocked to see kids treated that way. I worked at a protestant Christian summer camp for 5 summers, and it was nothing like that. It was a normal summer camp, where kids can have fun in the outdoors, and yes, discuss God. Politics are not a part of the curriculum. The leaders of the “Jesus Camp” in this film have no compassion for children, no love for others…and that is the biggest tragedy of all. If you want to compare fundamentalist Christians with fundamentalist Islam, you must also compare that both are twisted views of the respective faith’s true messages, and that these fundamentalist views do not represent Christianity or Islam.
i just watched the movie now, sobbed my eyes out. i am a Catholic, South African and could not believe what these extremists are doing to innocent kid’s minds. you can tell a child anything and they will believe it, look at the example of Santa Claus. These kids are being brainwashed and it scares me! There are so many problems in this world, global warming caused by pollution, consumerism, corporation control, poverty and the list goes on, this world doesnt need christianality to corrupt the world on top of everything else… christianality is our last hope.
this movie shows truth, i had no idea of these going ons and nor do many people i know, thus it is not a bore but an insight into a problem we need to solve, getting the truth out and making people aware of it and holding a mirror up to these people are the first steps.
I agree with Jay, but i think Ewing and Grady made the right decision by keeping the debate to a minimum.
If they had “a more sophisticated look into this phenomenon” it would have undoubtedly colored the movie far more with their bias. Ultimately this would have provided those who seek to discredit it with more fodder.
i think that i would have preferred a documentary that pandered to my point of view and dug deeper, but i think others would have hated that same documentary.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
robert said,
October 4, 2006 @ 11:14 amit sounds like you wanted this film to be more subjective. i think people will get out of this film what they bring. though i think with some of the editing,eerie music,and commentary from te air america host it is subltley one sided. i think your wrong about it preaching to the converted, many people including christitans have never seen this phenomenon before,pentacostal,evnagilcals, brainwashing children is not that common among catholics,mormons,mail line christians etc. i grew up in a fundamentalist christian home,and went to a very indoctrinating pentacostal school, and i never experienced anything like this movie. i saw this movie with a very hip intelligent san francisco audience and they were stimulatined and disturbed by the film. so speak for yourself when you say bore audiences, this is an important movie,and it desnt need more subtlety it speaks for itself.
robert
san francisco